organisation-supply-chain-managment-

Criteria

Quality of Information / Evidence

Support of Ideas / Analysis

Grade of “F”

-limited information on topic with lack of research, details or historically accurate evidence

-limited connections made between evidence, subtopics, counterarguments & thesis / topic -lack of analysis

Grade of “C”

-some aspects of paper is researched with some accurate evidence from limited sources with some citations

-some connections made between evidence, subtopics, arguments & thesis / topic showing analysis

Grade of “B”

-paper is well researched in detail with accurate & critical evidence from a variety of sources that is properly cited

-consistent connections made

between evidence, subtopics, arguments & thesis / topic showing good analysis

Grade of “A”

-paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed and historically accurate with critical evidence from a wide variety of sources that is all properly cited

-exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent

connections made between arguments, evidence, subtopics, & thesis / topic showing excellent analysis

Organization / Development of Ideas

-paper lacks clear and logical development of ideas with weak transition b/w ideas and paragraphs

-somewhat clear and logical development of subtopics with adequate transitions b/w paragraphs

-clear and logical subtopic order that supports thesis with good transitions b/w paragraphs

-exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of subtopics that support thesis with excellent transition b/w paragraphs

Bibliography Introduction /

Thesis

-total lack of proper APA formatting and little or no sources at all

-weak introduction

topic, thesis & subtopics -thesis is weak and lacks an arguable position

-some errors in APA format with most sources shown

-adequate introduction that states topic , thesis and some of the subtopics – thesis is somewhat clear and arguable

-mostly proper APA formatting used in alphabetical order with all (3) sources shown and a variety of sources

-proficient

introduction that states background information, controversial question, topic, thesis, and all subtopics in proper order – thesis is a clear and arguable statement of position

-total proper, detailed APA formatting always used in alphabetical order with all (3) sources shown and a wide variety of sources

-exceptional introduction

that grabs interest of reader and states background information, controversial question, topic, thesis, and all subtopics in proper order – thesis is exceptionally clear, arguable, well developed, and a definitive statement

Conclusion

-lack of summary of topic, thesis & subtopics with weak concluding ideas

-adequate summary of topic, thesis and some subtopics with some final concluding ideas

-good summary of topic, thesis and all subtopics with clear concluding ideas

-excellent summary of topic (with no new information), with all subtopics in proper order with strong concluding ideas

Language Conventions

– inconsistent grammar, spelling and paragraphing throughout paper

-paper has some errors in grammar, spelling and paragraphing

-paper is clear, with mostly proper grammar, spelling and paragraphing

-paper is very concise, clear, with consistently proper grammar, spelling and paragraphing